http://carlesm.com/2006/04/java-the-hard-way/ La mosca collonera, 4a època Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:50:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://carlesm.com/2006/04/java-the-hard-way/comment-page-1/#comment-52 remarde78 Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:23:58 +0000 http://carlesm.com/fedora-core-5-installation-notes/java-the-hard-way/#comment-52 Hi, Perhaps is it a candid question but i would like to install the jdk on a intel 64 bits architecture. Do i need to choose the jdk-1_5_0_11-linux-i586.bin file or jdk-1_5_0_11-linux-amd64.bin (for <strong>Linux x64 Platform - J2SE(TM) Development Kit 5.0 Update 11) </strong> file? Why this question because in the name of the second file i see AMD but the cpu i have is an intel CPU.Thanks in advance for your answer.Regards. Hi, Perhaps is it a candid question but i would like to install the jdk on a intel 64 bits architecture. Do i need to choose the jdk-1_5_0_11-linux-i586.bin file or jdk-1_5_0_11-linux-amd64.bin (for Linux x64 Platform – J2SE(TM) Development Kit 5.0 Update 11)  file? Why this question because in the name of the second file i see AMD but the cpu i have is an intel CPU.Thanks in advance for your answer.Regards.

]]> http://carlesm.com/2006/04/java-the-hard-way/comment-page-1/#comment-51 David Barroso Sun, 05 Nov 2006 15:06:20 +0000 http://carlesm.com/fedora-core-5-installation-notes/java-the-hard-way/#comment-51 If your yum configuration (/etc/yum.conf) includes the gpgcheck=1 option, the yum localinstall command will result in the following message: <em>Package java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.09-1jpp.i586.rpm is not signed</em> You must set the gpgcheck option to 0 to solve the problem. If your yum configuration (/etc/yum.conf) includes the gpgcheck=1 option, the yum localinstall command will result in the following message: <em>Package java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.09-1jpp.i586.rpm is not signed</em> You must set the gpgcheck option to 0 to solve the problem.

]]>